I am a 2024-25 Pre-Doctoral Fellow at the Skalny Center for Polish and Central European Studies at University of Rochester. Prior to my doctoral study, I studied Business Administration at Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea. My research specialization includes international political economy, politics of trade, firm lobbying and quantitative methods (with particular interest in causal inference and large language models).
I'm on academic job market for the 2024-2025 cycle.
If you'd like to know more about me when I'm off-duty, visit my Attic and get a sneak peek of my life as a painter and a LEGO aficionado! And one last thing - Go BILLS! 🏈
At Genesee Riverway Trail, 2022
Rise of superstar firms marked the new era of the international intellectual property (IP) rights protection regime guided by the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Despite the opposed views from developing nations on TRIPS, particularly in terms of stringent IP rights protection standards that the agreement puts forward, the United States has succeeded in extending the TRIPS regime by embedding TRIPS-plus provisions in their preferential trade agreement negotiations, with other advanced industrialized nations following suit. This study attributes the success the United States has had in the proliferation of the TRIPS regime to its development finance allocation strategy vis-à-vis developing countries. I utilize the National Trade Estimate (NTE) reports spanning from 1995 to 2022 published annually by the United States Office of Trade Representative (USTR) to create a semantic proxy for the US assessment of IP rights protection in its trade partners, harnessing cutting-edge large language model DeBERTa-v3. The analyses employing the proxy show that (1) IP-relevant lobbying by US corporate elites drives the US evaluation of current IP regimes in their investment destinations, (2) developing countries faced with significant concerns from US firms about their IP environment are more likely to be compensated by the United States when signing TRIPS-plus trade agreements, with the forms of compensation varying by their regime type. Democracies tend to receive increased foreign aid, whereas autocracies are more likely to benefit from International Finance Corporation (IFC) lending to their private sectors. The findings resonate with the supply-side view of strategic aid, where congressional support facilitates aid rewards to democracies than to autocracies, and offer a nuanced perspective of understanding US strategic influence in multilateral lending as a complementarity to foreign aid allocation, less bounded by domestic political considerations in selecting targets.
Email jihye.park at rochester.edu
Postal 101F Harkness Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627